A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that nearly 20 percent of IVC filters were unsuccessfully removed.
Retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are marketed as a temporary treatment for pulmonary embolism.
The medical device, meant to be removed when a patient’s risk has subsided, is an attempt to avoid potential long-term problems caused by permanent filters.
However, researchers have discovered that IVC filters are not always removable. Recent data illustrates that unretrieved IVC filters may come with a variety of additional complications.
Details of the Study
Researchers analyzed the medical records of 952 patients with IVC filters.
Image: IRMC
In April 2013, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a study that tested the safety of retrievable vena cava filters. The research focused on making conclusions about “complications, follow-up data, date of IVC filter retrieval, and use of anticoagulant therapy.”
Boston Medical Center began reviewing IVC filter use between August 1, 2003, and February 28, 2011. The study included 978 patients total, but 26 were excluded due to incomplete medical records. Overall, researchers analyzed 952 medical records.
Discovering Complications
Patients experiencing complications with IVC filters may need to undergo prolonged treatment in a hospital setting.
Image: Medical News Today
Of the 679 retrievable IVC filters that were placed, 58 were successfully removed. However, nearly 20 percent of attempts were unsuccessful. Researchers concluded that “unretrieved removable IVC filters may carry significant long-term risks.”
Additionally, the team cited 10 serious filter-related complications stemming from the lack of removal. These painful complexities required patients to be admitted to the hospital, sometimes for an extended period of time.
Examples of these issues included a 33-year-old man with a fractured IVC filter that lodged in a pulmonary artery and a 56-year-old man who experienced filter perforation that caused abdominal bleeding.
“The Food and Drug Administration recommends that IVC filters should be removed as soon as the risk of PE has subsided,” according to the study.
A systematic review of 37 studies confirmed an increased rate of complications associated with filters left in place for longer than 30 days, including recurrent deep vein thrombosis, vena cava thrombosis, organ penetration, migration, and strut fracture.
Patients who experienced complications with IVC filters should complete a no-obligation survey to find out if they are eligible for legal compensation.
CitizensReport
Latest posts by CitizensReport (see all)
- 4 Natural Alternatives To Energy Drinks That Will Make You Feel Healthier - February 19, 2018
- NBC Nightly News Publishes Expose On IVC Filters - February 18, 2018
- Good Sugar, Bad Sugar: Why You Should Eat More Fruit - February 16, 2018
Join the discussion