Women injured by transvaginal mesh are suing product manufacturers in liability lawsuits that hold companies responsible for defective designs.

Thousands of women have been injured by transvaginal mesh. As the number of lawsuits increase, it seems that many of these individuals are standing up to the makers of dangerous mesh devices.

Women affected by transvaginal mesh are increasingly proving that they weren’t adequately warned about the product’s potential risks. Now, a new claim is emerging.

In addition to marketing failures, mesh makers are now being held legally liable for defects in their product design.

Poor Design Is A Major Factor In Mesh Litigation

Individuals can gain compensation from mesh makers liable for products that caused injuries and even death.
Image: Livestrong

Product liability lawsuits are gaining traction as prosecutors prove that mesh devices are made with an inherently defective design.

“An estimated 100,000 lawsuits have been filed in U.S. state and federal courts against companies that make transvaginal mesh devices, alleging that poor design and substandard materials can cause side effects such as bleeding, infection, and nerve damage,” according to a report published in Reuters.

Recently, a major mesh maker, Boston Scientific, has been ordered pay $100 million to patients who developed complications caused by faulty mesh products. Many of these women were implanted with Pinnacle and Advantage Fit vaginal mesh.

One  51-year-old patient underwent two reparative surgeries after her mesh was implanted  in 2009. The device, meant to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI), is permanently infused with her tissue. She was awarded $25 million for her pain and suffering.

Thousands of women have been injured by defective mesh designs. If your vaginal mesh failed and required an additional surgery, then you might be entitled to compensation for receiving a faulty medical device.

Complete a free, no-obligation case evaluation now to see if you qualify.

The post Mesh Maker Held Legally Liable For Faulty Product Design appeared first on Citizens Report.

While the health agency in Scotland attempts to deal with complications caused by transvaginal mesh implants, the FDA has stayed quiet.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a public health communication about the dangers of transvaginal mesh for the first time in 2008. The warning came after the agency received over 1,000 reports from nine surgical mesh manufacturers in just three years.

The FDA’s initial safety communication described complications from transvaginal mesh as very rare. However, problems with transvaginal mesh implants are occurring around the world.

Some governments have recognized that they have failed to provide the kind of education that would protect mesh patients from suffering. Scotland has issued an apology for their lack of attention to the dangers of transvaginal mesh, committing to finding a better way to regulate the devices and inform the public about possible side effects.

A Governmental Apology Abroad

Shona Robison, Scotland’s Cabinet Secretary for Health, Wellbeing and Sport, apologized to victims of transvaginal mesh at a committee hearing in Oct. 2015.
Image: Huffington Post

In Scotland, transvaginal mesh devices caused a whole slew of complications for hundreds of women who had already been suffering from prolapse or urine issues.

The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) released data on how many women are affected by the devices. Of the 1,850 patients implanted with mesh in Scotland each year, the agency found:

• 1-3% stress urinary incontinence patients suffer complications.
• 2-6% pelvic organ prolapse patients suffer complications.

But the victims of transvaginal mesh felt that they had been ignored. They began to organize and fight for justice, coming together to create a group called Scottish Mesh Survivors. After launching a petition, the survivors finally got the government’s attention. The apology was later issued at a committee hearing.

“I’m happy to apologize to the women for having to basically campaign to bring it to everyone’s attention,” according to Shona Robison, the Cabinet Secretary for Health, Wellbeing and Sport in Scotland.

“It should never have taken women to have to campaign in this way to shine a light on this issue. I want to thank them for all that they have done. They have left a legacy for other women,” she added.

Two members of Scottish Mesh Survivors, Elaine Holmes and Olive McIlroy, have called for an independent investigation that would evaluate the safety of mesh devices. In addition, the agency is working to institute training programs for medical staff to better inform potential mesh patients about the possibility of side effects.

FDA Stays Quiet On The Subject

The U.S. government hasn’t released an update on transvaginal mesh since 2011.
Image: Daily Business Review

Although the U.S. government has spoken about mesh complications before, the agency has yet to follow suit. In 2011, the FDA updated the initial announcement in a safety communication that affirmed “serious complications associated with surgical mesh for transvaginal repair of POP are not rare.”

The statement also informed the public that the FDA will “evaluate the effects of using surgical mesh to repair SUI,” with the results being announced at a later date. It has been almost five years since the agency made this statement.

In the interim, many patients who have transvaginal mesh implants have experienced severe pain and suffering. If your vaginal mesh failed and required an additional surgery, then you might be entitled to compensation for receiving a faulty medical device.

Complete a free, no obligation case evaluation now to see if you qualify.

The post Scotland’s Health Minister Apologizes To Women Injured By Transvaginal Mesh appeared first on Citizens Report.